Draft write-up From grouped survey answers. Not a diagnosis.
DraftExecutive summary (draft): Open Draft to write this from the survey results.
Someone must Accept this before it goes into a PDF, Word, or PowerPoint. Groups with too few answers stay hidden. Nothing is made up.
Overall concern — Job demands × Job resources
Job demands against job resourcesScores on a 1–5 ? scale. Org n=0.
Demands vs resources (radar)
Inline SVG Org cut meansJob demands — factor bars
↓ lower preferable org cutJob resources — factor bars
↑ higher preferable org cutTraffic-light by hazard / factor
Snapshot 1–5 scale| Hazard | Risk | Score |
|---|---|---|
| High/low job demands | Low | 0.0 |
| Remote/isolated work | Low | 0.0 |
| Poor environment | Low | 0.0 |
| Violence/aggression | Low | 0.0 |
| Trauma exposure | Low | 0.0 |
| Bullying | Low | 0.0 |
| Harassment including sexual harassment | Low | 0.0 |
| Low job control | Low | 0.0 |
| Poor support | Low | 0.0 |
| Low role clarity | Low | 0.0 |
| Poor change management | Low | 0.0 |
| Low reward/recognition | Low | 0.0 |
| Poor organisational justice | Low | 0.0 |
| Poor workplace relationships | Low | 0.0 |
Published research comparison
Australian working population, from the named paper. Does not change when you re-run this survey.Rahimi, Arnold, LaMontagne and Riley (2025). Validation and benchmarks for the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III) in an Australian working population sample. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21845-x
Published figures are weighted Australian working-population means on a 0–100 scale (Tables 1–2), except violence, bullying, and harassment rows, which are 12-month prevalence. This organisation’s survey is on a 1–5 scale. The two columns are not the same instrument. This table does not auto-refresh. Remote/isolated work, poor environment, and trauma exposure have no honest COPSOQ III analogue in this paper, so no published number is shown for those factors.
| This survey | Published scale | Published AU mean | Desirable | This organisation (1–5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High/low job demands | Quantitative Demands | 40.7 / 100 | Low | — |
| High/low job demands | Work Pace | 57.0 / 100 | Low | — |
| High/low job demands | Emotional Demands | 40.5 / 100 | Low | — |
| Low job control | Influence | 51.0 / 100 | High | — |
| Poor support | Social Support from Supervisors | 58.1 / 100 | High | — |
| Poor support | Social Support from Colleagues | 52.9 / 100 | High | — |
| Low role clarity | Role Clarity | 72.7 / 100 | High | — |
| Poor change management | Predictability | 58.3 / 100 | High | — |
| Low reward/recognition | Recognition | 62.7 / 100 | High | — |
| Poor organisational justice | Organisational Justice | 59.8 / 100 | High | — |
| Poor workplace relationships | Sense of Community at Work | 67.5 / 100 | High | — |
| Poor workplace relationships | Mutual Trust between Employees | 63.8 / 100 | High | — |
| Violence/aggression | Threats of Violence | 12.9% (12-month) | Low | — |
| Violence/aggression | Physical Violence | 10.2% (12-month) | Low | — |
| Bullying | Bullying | 19.6% (12-month) | Low | — |
| Harassment including sexual harassment | Sexual Harassment | 12.8% (12-month) | Low | — |